A Britisher has written to Deenabandhu Andrews a
letter on the war expounding his own views. He is an ardent
pacifist. Deenabandhu has shared the letter with me. In it occur the
following paragraphs:
"For India too I think that this is a very critical
time. The danger I see is that Britain may promise full Dominion
Status or something of the kind, and as a result India will raise an
army and become one more military-minded nation. Her witness for the
way of non-violence and soul-force would then be largely discounted.
“How can Gandhiji as a believer in non-violence ask
for clarification of war aims with a view to getting India's support
for Britain in this way of war? The only thing that he can do and
that we should all be doing is to build up an army of men and women
who are committed to the way of love and forgiveness and to receive,
but never to return, violence. We have to work this out to see how
it will alter our daily life as well as all our thinking and acting
towards other communities and nations. We have to be disciplined in
this and also to learn to act together as one man. Along this line I
see tremendous possibilities.
"Of course, we should also use all the influence we
can to urge Britain to acknowledge and put into practice full
democracy in India, as it is a high principle quite apart from
whether India helps Britain in the war or not."
The danger that the writer senses is real. I dealt
with it last week. The writer cavils at my sympathy with the Allies.
I have shown it as an out-and-out believer in nonviolence, even
because of my belief. Whilst all violence is bad and must be
condemned in the abstract, it is permissible for, it is even the
duty of, a believer in Ahimsa to distinguish between the aggressor
and the defender. Having done so, he will side with the defender in
a non-violent manner, i. e. give his life in saving him. His
intervention is likely to bring a speedier end to the duel, and may
even result in bringing about peace between the combatants. Applying
the argument to the present war, if the Congress actively sides with
the Allies in a non-violent way, the Congress assistance will lift
the Allied cause to a high moral plane, and the Congress influence
will be effectively used in the cause of peace. What is more it will
be the special business of the Congress to see that, if the war is
fought to a finish, no humiliation is heaped upon the vanquished.
That is the role I have conceived for the Congress. The declaration
of independence has become a necessity. The question having been
raised, the Congress cannot help Britain, if Britain is secretly
fighting for imperialism while it declares to the world that the
fight is for saving democracies. For Britain to be in the right, a
clear declaration of her war aim is a necessity, irrespective of the
Congress policy.
Sevagram, 16-10-'39
Harijan, 21-10-1939