This evening when as usual before the prayer meeting the audience
was asked if there was any objector to the Koran verses being
recited as part of the prayer, one member spoke up and persisted in
his objection. Gandhiji had made it clear that if there was such
objection, he would neither have public prayer nor the after-prayer
speech on current events. Consequently, he sent word that there
would be neither prayer nor speech before the public. But the
gathering would not disperse without seeing Gandhiji. He, therefore,
went to the rostrum and said a few words on the reason for
abstention and the working of Ahimsa as he understood it. He said
that it was unseemly for anyone to object to the prayer, especially,
when it was on a private lawn. Nevertheless, his Ahimsa warned him
against disregarding even one objector when overwhelming majorities
were likely to overawe one person into silence. It would be
otherwise if the whole audience objected. It would then be his duty
to have the prayer even at the risk of being molested. There was
also the further consideration that the majority should not be
disappointed for the sake of one objector. The remedy was simple. If
the majority restrained themselves and entertained no anger against,
or evil design on, the solitary objector it would be his duty to
hold the prayer. The possibility, however, was that if the whole
audience was non-violent in intention and action, the objector would
restrain himself. Such he held was the working of non-violence.
Birla House,
New Delhi,
30-10-'47
Harijan,
9-11-1947