The moment the mighty figure of Gandhi rises before us, the question presents itself: What is his relevance today and for the future? What
inspiration can we draw from his life? What light can his thought
and wisdom shed on our problems? How does his way of life affect
our course of action in private and public affairs? That Gandhi is
relevant today and for centuries to come is not in doubt at all.
The words which Jawaharlal Nehru uttered almost immediately after
Gandhi's sudden exit from this world are found to prove prophetic.
He said, The light is gone and yet it will shine for a thousand
years. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., the Nobel Peace Prize winner of
U.S.A., came to India as a pilgrim in 1959. After a month's sojourn
in the land of Gandhi, on the eve of his departure, he was asked a
cynical question at a press conference in Delhi. Where is Gandhi
today? He was asked: we see him nowhere. Dr. King's reply was that
Gandhi was inevitable. If humanity is to progress, Gandhi is
inescapable. He lived, thought and acted, inspired by the vision of
a humanity evolving towards a world of peace and harmony. We may
ignore him only at our own risk.
The relevance of a man or his message can be said to have many aspects. It can be immediate or remote; it can be local, regional or general; it can be
personally relevant to some or universally for all. In the case of
Gandhi all these aspects of his relevance can be studied with
profit.
Man, in Gandhi's eyes, was the measure. Gandhi's approach to himself, and
to life in general, was that of a seeker of truth and of a votary of
nonviolence or love. His was a scientific mind and he sought for
that law of life and being which would promote the common weal and
help man to reach higher elevations of consciousness. He perceived
that love, spelt as nonviolence in thought, word and deed, was the
shortest cut to human progress and evolution, both individual and
social. In his eyes, progressive nonviolence could express itself
best through service, self-suffering and, if necessary, total
sacrifice. His mind was always open, fresh and receptive to truth
as he went on finding it from day to day by experience. For him,
while his own consciousness was the laboratory for searching out the
inner core of truth, human society was the field for social
experiments which could lead to harmony and happiness. In whatever
corner of the world he worked for the time being, the whole of
humanity and its good were always present to him.
One very important aspect of his life adds measure significantly to what he
thought and did. He lived day in and day out open to public view,
as on a stage. He took the people and even his opponents into
confidence not only in regard to his actions but even his
motivations. The result is that none in history has left behind so
much of documentation and direct evidence concerning everything he
thought and did. Moreover, he himself has written so much and on
every conceivable subject that his writings are likely to run into
fifty to sixty sumptuous volumes of five hundred pages each. All
this material is proving very helpful in assessing Gandhi's
relevance both for the present and for the future.
It is impossible in a few brief pages to cover all the aspects of Gandhi's
life and teaching which are of relevance to our own times and
environment. Here I shall merely draw the attention of the reader
to three aspects of his life which are of the utmost importance.
The life-story of Gandhi as a man is of the greatest relevance to every human being who aspires to rise above the average level and lead a meaningful life, with the watchword, "From good to better daily
self-surpassed". Gandhi was not merely a moralist but one who
believed that man has a great future and that he is evolving towards
a higher and nobler destiny. He knew the power of the many vital
and sensual urges of man. He has also confessed with remarkable
frankness his own weaknesses in this matter. But what makes a study
of his life most helpful is the unceasing attempt he makes to
conquer these weaknesses and establish the superiority of moral and
spiritual endeavour. Not one of us is free from the weaknesses our
minds are subject to. At the same time, every one of us wishes to
rise above the excessive demands of the flesh. This constant
struggle goes on within us and we require not only inspiration and
strength to win this inner battle but also some practical guidance
to overcome our weaknesses. Gandhi is eminently fitted to be a good
guide to us because he is extremely human and does not interpose any
distance between himself and us by assuming an air of superiority or
authority. He declared that what he had done, or was doing, every
other human being was equally capable of doing. That self-control
is the key to the higher and happier life was his constant refrain.
His progress in this matter was not by a sudden conversion, or
through the grace of some saint or seer or holy shrine. From and
erring, faltering, stumbling and struggling youth, Gandhi rose to
the eminence of being called "a moral genius" by no less a person
than the celebrated British philosopher, C.E.M. Joad. This eminence
he attained not be accident or luck or good fortune but by a
determined and steady effort at self-discipline. His outer life and
actions were but the reflection of his inner struggle to hold fast
to truth, to truthful living, and to achiever good ends only through
good, virtuous, nonviolent means. We can easily see what great
importance he attached to self-control and personal virtue if we
remember that he felt it necessary to take the vow of continence on
the eve of launching the great campaign of satyagraha in South
Africa. If one wishes to study a modern life, as in a film, a life
which chastened itself from step to step and ultimately became the
powerful force that raised a nation from utter slavery to dignified
independence, one would have to go to Gandhi. There is something
very intimate and personal, something very familiar and near in
Gandhi's life because it is so open and sincere. Not only his
celebrated autobiography, but his enormous and multitudinous
correspondence and even the editorial columns of the journals which
he edited for years and in which he always wrote in first person,
all these reflect the process of his development from time to time.
His every word, spoken or written, is like a link in the dialogue
between his ego and his higher self. It exposes to view the springs
of motivation and action and thus renders the greatest service to
man evolving from the stage of animality to humanity, from untruth
to truth, from darkness to light, from hatred to love, from
selfishness to altruism, from man the beast to man the god, which is
really what all men aspire to be.
What other life can be so relevant and helpful to all of us?
As one reads about the inner life of Gandhi one finds that his had been a heroic struggle against what he thought was mean, low and below the human
level. His endeavour was to rise above the life of the senses and
life the life of the spirit. That is why Tolstoy's The Kingdom of
Heaven is Within You appealed to him so immensely. He laid the
greatest store by self-purification. The evil outside was, in his
eyes, the reflection of the evil and weakness inside oneself. The
inner and the outer world were but the obverse and reverse of the
same coin, namely, our existence, our being. If the evil inside was
to be fought and conquered, it was equally necessary for man to
fight all evil outside with as much determination and bravery.
While he was a saint and a holy man aspiring to be clean and pure,
above all the temptations of the flesh and beyond any selfish
motivation, and a true devotee of God or Truth, he was nevertheless
a saint in constant action, an activist of the highest order. He
was not satisfied with his own individual salvation. Like the
compassionate Buddha, he was inspired by the passion for relieving
every kind of suffering and for wiping out the last tear from the
eyes of the last man. That is why his most favourite song and
refrain was, "He alone is a true devotee of God who understands the
pain and suffering of others." His tireless striving to remove the
sources of every kind of suffering arose out of this extreme
sensitiveness to the pain of sentient beings, of course, including
him.
The other equally important and powerful urge which hold of Gandhi's whole
being early in life was "to return good for evil". He quotes in his
autobiography a stray line from a Gujarati poet which he read in his
boyhood. But to act according to this principle became a passion
with him throughout his life.
Thus this triple passion - to search in a scientific spirit for the law of the individual and social well-being and progress, to establish the
truth of that law through love and nonviolence, and always return
good for evil - dominated his life from the beginning to end.
If Gandhi's life, thought and action are extremely relevant and useful for every human being who is self-conscious and who aspired after a higher,
nobler and more exalted life than he may be living today, Gandhi's
teaching as regards social life and its proper organization is
equally positive, constructive and practical. In fact, he called
himself a practical idealist. He did not even for a moment forget
that man is essentially a social being. Man's relationship to
sentient beings and man's relationship to material things may be
said to be the subjects of his incessant research during a long,
eventful and multifaceted life. While the fundamental lines of his
research, namely, the truth about the law of being and its search
through love alone, were once for all decided, his mind was always
open like that of a scientist to new discoveries. That is why we
find so much freshness in the way he deals with ever new
situations. Going along the path he had chalked out for himself, he
arrived at a social philosophy which could be characterized as a
synthesis between the needs, urges and aspirations of the individual
and of the society of which the individual is an inseparable and
indivisible part. He called it sarvodaya - the rise and well-being of
all. While it is the duty and responsibility of society to plan for
the fullest possible development of the best in every individual, it
is equally necessary that the individual render back unto society
what he, in fact, owes to society. Thus there has to be a balancing
of rights and obligations between the individuals and the society
which they compose. A society will be but an abstract concept if we
do not think in terms of the individuals who form it. An individual
is equally an abstract entity without a society to live in. Gandhi
therefore gave the greatest importance to the flowering of the
individual in a properly ordered society, and not merely to
organization and systems. A chain is only as strong as its weakest
link and a system is good and efficient only to the extent of the
goodness and efficiency of the individuals working it. Gandhi
applied these principles to all human organizations and systems,
economic, political and social.
Man, the individual, is the centre of Gandhi's system of thought. The
objective is the moral and spiritual development of man. Man is
primarily his consciousness, his capacity to be self-conscious, and
his built-in potentiality to judge between good and evil, between
what will help him in his evolution to higher levels of being and
what will obstruct his path. This gives him a leverage, not only to
aspire after higher levels but to endeavour to attain the same.
Gandhi believed in this self-effort and the path he outlined lay
through ethical, moral and spiritual disciplines. The key-note of
his ethics is love, which means near-identity of interest with every
sentient being; this love has to be expressed in the form of service
and sacrifice. His ethics in relation to material things and
property consisted in his concept of trusteeship. Every human being
is a trustee not only of his faculties and attainments but of
everything he comes by. And trusteeship consists not only in using
his powers and goods properly but in using them selflessly and for
the well-being of all others.
As indicated above, his social philosophy boils down to sarvodaya, which
precludes the suppression or elimination of any class. But the
question is how to bring about this millennium? The satyagraha way
of life is his reply. Insistence on the truth of one's own
experience through nonviolence alone, even unto death, is the royal
road he points out.
Gandhi saw that there was enough of truth, evil, injustice and exploitation in human relationships and public affairs. He was determined that all
that must go. He wanted to devise ways and means which would be
consistent with the principles he had laid down for himself as being
the best. He was as heroic in fighting the evil and injustice in
the world outside as in conquering the evil and weakness in his own
mind. The means he adopted satisfied the double demand, namely,
that they should be truthful and that they should be pure, moral and
constructive. Thus, in a world where science and technology have
put into the hand of those in possession of wealth, power and
authority weapons of coercion and destruction beyond ordinary
conception, Gandhi's weapon of satyagraha is a boon. It can be used
even by a single individual who has developed sufficient moral power
by his own purity of thought and conduct.
The relevance of satyagraha, both as a way of life and as a weapon for
evolutionary social change, need not now be in doubt when it is
being used successfully by the Negroes in U.S.A. under the able
guidance of Dr. Martin Luther King. Thought its use in an
international conflict has yet to be tried, one can hazard the
statement that non-alignment, moral pressure by non-aligned powers,
and the economic and other sanctions which the U.N.O. often thinks
of are along the line of nonviolent resistance to evil and
injustice. It may be said that Aldous Huxley, in his famous book
Ends and Means, has made a very good case for nonviolent resistance
by all those who suffer at the hands of modern governments which are
armed to the teeth with the modern instruments of coercion,
suppression and destruction. He says that it is the only remedy - and
a very civilized moral remedy at that.
The third aspect of Gandhi's teachings which can be taken note of here is his insistence on the resolution of all conflicts by peaceful means. He
declared that war and violence never solve any problems. They
create new ones and sow the seeds of future wars and the continuance
of hatred. The appearance of nuclear weapons, the use of which
involves total destruction, has made Gandhi's plea doubly forceful
and important if the future of humanity and its peaceful, orderly
progress is out concern. The only way is to cease to war against
each other and instead, use all our resources to war against the
common enemies of man, namely, ignorance, poverty, disease and so
on. We must devise means and provide ways to resolve conflicts
through negotiation, mediation, arbitration and tribunals - in fact,
by every other means than the use of weapons which necessarily
involves the destruction of life and property. It does not need any
argument to prove that this teaching of Gandhi is relevant so long
as conflicts are sought to be resolved through the use of
destructive weapons and missiles.
It is clear that Gandhi's life, thought, teaching and action are ever relevant for all aspirants of the ethical and spiritual life. His principles and technique of satyagraha are highly efficacious instruments of peaceful economic, social and political change whenever and wherever
it is required. His gospel of peaceful means for resolving all
conflicts is the only way to escape the disaster nuclear war. In
its totality, Gandhi's teaching is a highly inspiring one and serves
as a signpost to humanity marching towards a better, happier and
more harmonious world.
R.R. Diwakar