Panchayat has an ancient flavour; it is a good word. It literally means an
assembly of five elected by villagers. It represents the system, by which
the innumerable village republics of India were governed. But the British
Government, by its ruthlessly thorough method of revenue collection, almost
destroyed these ancient republics, which could not stand the shock of this
revenue collection. Congressmen are now making a crude attempt to revive the
system by giving village elders civil and criminal jurisdiction. The attempt
was first made in 1921. It failed. It is being made again, and it will fail
if it is not systematically and decently, I will not say, scientifically,
tried.
It was reported to me in Nainital, that in certain places in the U.P., even
criminal cases like rape were tried by the so-called Panchayats. I heard of
some fantastic judgments pronounced by ignorant or interested Panchayats.
This is all bad if it is true. Irregular Panchayats are bound to fall to
pieces under their own unsupportable weight. I suggest, therefore, the
following rules for the guidance of village workers:
The disability to impose fines or social boycott is a necessity of the case in the initial stages; social boycott in villages has been found to be a dangerous weapon in the hands of ignorant or unscrupulous men. Imposition of fines too may lead to mischief and defeat the very end in view. Where a Panchayat is really popular and increases its popularity by the constructive work of the kind suggested in clause 9, it will find its judgments and authority respected by reason of its moral prestige. And that surely is the greatest sanction anyone can possess and of which one cannot be deprived.
Young India,
28-5-1931